视频简介
1958年的早春，青海黄仁藏族地区的牧民们在党的领导下，走上了合作化的道路。反动活佛拉莫茸和大干户多尔吉预感到草原上的合作化运动已经从根本上动摇了他们奴隶主统治的基础。因此，他们藏匿了一个解放时漏网的蒋匪少校军官马乙奴，企图搞垮牧业社，进一步发动反革命叛乱。他们利用宗教和迷信拉拢群众，迫使牧民们怀疑并远离牧业社。拉莫茸指使小喇嘛旦增在牧业社修建定居点的工地上偷偷地埋上一块刻有经文的石头。牧民们响应牧业社的号召，结束流浪迁徙的游牧生活，他们兴高采烈地盖定居房子。牧业社主任尕布藏在挖地基时，挖出了一块经石，少数被宗教思想束缚的群众见了经石，不知吉凶，纷纷去寺院里念经。他们听信了活佛拉莫茸的鬼话，以为牧业社盖房动了神山神土，天有浩劫，人有横祸，于是虔诚地祈求神佛恕罪，牧业社的定居修建工程遭受挫折。马乙奴、拉莫茸进一步组织叛乱，佯称西藏有一位活佛要来讲经，受了欺骗的群众被赶到龙茵寺里修建马圈。县委书记万马同志根据了解的情况，证实了反动分子策划叛乱的企图，马上布置对策，防止叛乱的发生。带着西藏叛匪密令来组织黄仁叛乱的马乙奴，化装成管家藏在寺院里，但他的出现早被治安代表才仁错发现。马乙奴想探听治安会议的内情，把开会回来的才仁错绑架，囚禁在寺院中，拉莫茸亲自审问，并施以酷刑，并把她的爱女小卓玛作为人质。才仁错威武不屈。才仁错的丈夫尕布藏强抑悲痛，争取了寺院里的小喇嘛旦增，得到才仁错母女的下落，掌握了寺院里阴谋活动的情况。根据深入调查得来的情况，尕布藏召集紧急会议，决定调拉莫茸等人到县里开会，调虎离山，瓦解叛乱；并布置民兵加强防范。马乙奴、拉莫茸看到阴谋被识破，指使喽啰在敖包山上撒桃花杏花瓣，诡称天降“花雨”世道要变，群众被逼上山朝拜。群众上山后，喇嘛强发枪支，要群众参加叛乱。哈东活佛反对叛乱，当场被敌人捆绑。民兵赶到救下哈东活佛。人民解放军配合各路民兵包围山头，匪首被擒，匪徒纷纷投降。牧民们又投入到建设家园、发展生产的建设中。。A story tells about five students and their professor from Kyiv archaelogical Institute. They are going to the trip to nearby forest. There they find a pit closed with rusty grid... The film is quite funny, but trying to look scary, increasing the suspense. But the suspense is weak, because the things happening on the screen aren't frightening enough. Most actors are playing th...。Herbert Vesely was one of the promises for a new German cinema already in the 50's, but after the 60's his star was already dimmed. He made a small number of films in the 70's and 80's, all non too good. This biography of Egon Schiele, one of the most important Austrian artists, is an example of the pretensions and emptiness of a Vesely-film of later date. The life of Schiele is presented here as a puzzle| well, Vesely thinks that Schiele's life was a puzzle: the core of the story is centered around the famous 1912 pornography trial and using this as base the film shows fragments of past and future. The problem is that it never becomes a unity and that the order of scenes and sequences seems to be at random: a cut-and-paste job that could have had any other result. Indeed, after seeing it twice I am almost convinced of it that a unsatisfactory linear thought-out film was changed into the puzzle in the editing room. Egon Schiele was an enigmatic man, but not a total puzzle, and this film does not bring him any closer. The films also fails in conveying the eroticism and meaning of the Schiele's paintings: the camera watches and glides over the models without any understanding of Schiele's intentions, we only see beautiful naked bodies. If interested in Schiele, you better buy a book with his works in stead.。
